China’s Grand Design for Housing
Published on: July 06, 2020 • Duration: 7 minutes
Roger Hirst and Joanna Davies, Senior Economist at Fathom Consulting, talk about how China is trying to reinvent its economy by using Corona virus as a catalyst for change. Has China been able to initiate real change, rather than simply extending the credit-fueled expansion of the last decade? Is there spare capacity in the property market and what is the outlook for employment?
The content and information (“Content”) in the video programs (“Video Programs”) is provided for informational purposes only and not investment advice. You should not construe any such Content, information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other professional advice nor does any such information constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed. None of the Content constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer by Refinitiv or any third party service provider to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in this or in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. All Content is information of a general nature, is illustrative only and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Refinitiv is not a fiduciary by virtue of any person’s use of or access to the Video Programs or Content. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content in the Video Programs before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for accessing and viewing the Video Programs and Content, you agree not to hold Refinitiv, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Video Programs.
The Content and information in the Video Programs has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Refinitiv makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the Content. Any opinion or recommendation expressed in the Video Programs is subject to change without notice. Refinitiv does not recommend, explicitly nor implicitly, nor suggest or recommend any investment strategy. Refinitiv disclaims all liability for any loss that may arise (whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental, punitive or otherwise) from any use of the information in Video Programs. Refinitiv does not have regard to any individual’s, group of individuals’ or entity’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or circumstances. Refinitiv does not express any opinion on the future value of any security, currency or other investment instrument. You should seek expert financial and other advice regarding the appropriateness of the material discussed or recommended in the Video Programs and should note that investment values may fall, you may receive back less than originally invested and past performance is not necessarily reflective of future performance
Roger Hirst [00:00:07] Welcome to The Corona Correction Series in association with Refinitiv. I'm your host, Roger Hirst. China has been trying to reinvent its economy for the past few years and intends to use the upheaval from the Corona crisis as yet another catalyst for change. Joanna Davies, Senior Economist of Fathom Consulting, however, remains skeptical that China has been able to initiate real change, rather than simply extending the credit-fueled expansion of the last decade. I asked her about the spare capacity in the property market and the outlook for employment.
Joanna Davies [00:00:36] Struggling to find alternative sources of sustainable growth, china's policymakers have long encouraged the investment boom that we've seen in China, and I think really their response to Covid 19 is no different, and the rhetoric might be about them pushing into 5G and high tech investments, but actually that's nothing new. We've seen this all before. It's very reminiscent of Xi's 'Made in China 2025' plan, which was all about pushing China into these high tech fields, climbing by a chain, and actually China's had very little progress on that front. And it's also gone quite quiet on that front. Since it's become sort of the crosshairs of the tensions between the US, and China. So while others seem to be of the opinion that this test, that Covids brought China and arguably the biggest test on record for the Chinese economy, provides an opportunity for China to reorientate its economy and move away from these old levers of growth, such as home investment and more into the conceiver and the high tech. We're actually far more skeptical on that front. I think part of the reason for our skepticism is that rebalancing is really difficult to do. So we've looked at how other emerging markets have attempted rebalancing. And on average, growth kind of is static in the immediate aftermath of those efforts. But even after that immediate impact, growth is still considerably weaker, about two percentage points on average. So we're talking sort of three, four years after that initial and difficult period of trying to reorientate the economy growth is still weaker. And recognizing that, we've had this very half-hearted approach from China. We've referred to that in our research as China's "hokie cokie" approach to reforms so kind of neither all in or neither out as well. One manifestation of this that is probably worth pointing to is in China's housing market. So China now has an absolutely massive amount of unfinished floor space so the equivalent of seven billion square meters. So just to put that into kind of terms that you and I are more used to, that equates to 17 million houses in the UK. That's enough for every single one of us to have our own property and some. And as a consequence of all of this investment in infrastructure and also holding properties back into this construction phase rather than finishing them and releasing them onto the market, the consequence of that, it now takes seven years start to finish for a project to be done or declared as complete or vacant in China. Imagine a property taking that long to build in the UK. I dont know whether you have ever seen the show grand designs. It's just a TV program with typical people, normal people like you and me. They suddenly want to fulfill their dream homes. They're getting set about building them and as you can imagine, just regular people that are just absolute calamities. Very few take that long to complete the construction of and these are complete novices, not construction firms that are professional and doing this the entire time. And so it really goes some way to highlight the extent of the problem in China. But why are Chinese authorities choosing to have all of these properties just stuck in the construction phase? Well, for several reasons. So, first of all, it's a really handy way to keep resources tied up, especially in an economic downturn if you're worried about unemployment and social unrest. What better way than really to help people dig holes just to fill them back up again? It keeps resources busy and prevents social unrest. The other element is that it is a handy way to support the economy, to push in a downturn without weighing on property prices. So if all of these properties were to be completed and a glut of them, glut of finished property went onto the housing market, it would depress prices and property prices are really important to the social fabric of China's wealthy. So too are they to local authorities. So the way that China's managed that relationship is and for many, many years, the supply of property. So those completed or declared is vacant. China has lined it up so that they perfectly match the demand for those properties. So the time it takes to clear properties is one year, basically. More recently, things have become even tighter and the stock of ready to go properties and would clear in less than a year. But the problem is with all of this, is well, those resources aren't being used productively. We actually have a measure that we call our China Urban Underemployment Indicator. Rather than just looking at unemployment in China, we actually consider underemployment. So all of those workers aren't being used productively. And if our estimates are right, that's going to exceed 25 percent of the labor force this year. That's huge. So China's problem, I think, in light of Covid 19 has just become exaggerated or highlighted even more. Essentially, they've got this careful juggling act between maintaining growth and cushioning the downturn, preventing social instability or unrest. All the while trying not to burst the property price bubble that they've essentially put an implicit guarantee underneath.
Roger Hirst [00:06:04] It would appear that fixed-asset investment, and in particular housing, rather than a rotation towards consumption, have continued to be the engines of growth for China. But this growth is really an ongoing credit expansion. A spare capacity that's equivalent to a house for every individual. Not just every household, but each individual in the UK is certainly a sobering thought. For more data, Fathom's China database and chartbook have been made available through their partnership with Refinitiv. We'll see you later with another update.
You might like
Each week we examine major themes driving the markets and use Refinitiv’s best-in-class data to assess the risks and the opportunities for investors.