- The Big Conversation
- Episode 87: What does China's slowdown signal for markets?
The Big Conversation
Episode 87: What does China's slowdown signal for markets?
This week Real Vision’s Max Wiethe breaks down the economic data pointing to a potential slowdown in China. With China’s return to COVID restrictions, economic activity in the global superpower is already starting to take a hit, but asset prices in China have already taken a hit. In “The Chatter” section Jim Mitchell, head of Refinitiv’s Americas oil analysts, discusses the significance of the recent plea from the Biden administration for more pumping from OPEC+, how to quantify the potential demand shocks due to delta, and the new reality that demand and not supply may be the key factor driving oil prices.
The content and information (“Content”) in the video programs (“Video Programs”) is provided for informational purposes only and not investment advice. You should not construe any such Content, information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other professional advice nor does any such information constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed. None of the Content constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer by Refinitiv or any third party service provider to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments in this or in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. All Content is information of a general nature, is illustrative only and does not address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Refinitiv is not a fiduciary by virtue of any person’s use of or access to the Video Programs or Content. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other Content in the Video Programs before making any decisions based on such information or other Content. In exchange for accessing and viewing the Video Programs and Content, you agree not to hold Refinitiv, its affiliates or any third party service provider liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other Content made available to you through the Video Programs.
The Content and information in the Video Programs has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Refinitiv makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the Content. Any opinion or recommendation expressed in the Video Programs is subject to change without notice. Refinitiv does not recommend, explicitly nor implicitly, nor suggest or recommend any investment strategy. Refinitiv disclaims all liability for any loss that may arise (whether direct, indirect, consequential, incidental, punitive or otherwise) from any use of the information in Video Programs. Refinitiv does not have regard to any individual’s, group of individuals’ or entity’s specific investment objectives, financial situation or circumstances. Refinitiv does not express any opinion on the future value of any security, currency or other investment instrument. You should seek expert financial and other advice regarding the appropriateness of the material discussed or recommended in the Video Programs and should note that investment values may fall, you may receive back less than originally invested and past performance is not necessarily reflective of future performance
Max Wiethe [00:00:00] Economic growth in China is starting to show signs of weakness right as the world begins to react to renewed Delta virus concerns. Does this signal further headwinds for global growth with negative effects on global asset prices, or is this yet another wall of worry for markets to climb? If you have any questions about topics discussed in today's episode or any questions you like answered in future episodes, please put them in the comments below. After being one of the most aggressive actors on covid during the first wave, China was one of the first countries to return to normal, and they saw one of the fastest and most robust economic recoveries of any country. Now, as the variance spreads across the globe. China is once again one of the first countries to reimplement strict controls. This may already be showing up in economic data, as many of the key numbers for July missed expectations. With this weakness showing up across the board, retail sales help give a better picture of the strength of the Chinese consumer and coming in at eight point five percent year on year growth versus a ten point nine percent expectation. We aren't seeing negative activity yet, but a trend worth monitoring. Industrial production was not rosy either, coming in at six point four percent year on year growth versus an estimate of seven point nine percent. Also, in the period from January to July, fixed asset investment slowed to ten point three percent versus an estimate of eleven point three percent. Manufacturing also took a hit with the most recent Caixin manufacturing PMI coming in just barely positive at fifty point three for its third consecutive decline and second consecutive miss. All these numbers are still positive, but focus now shifts to the upcoming August data. Due to the lag in collecting and measuring economic activity, China could serve as a good barometer for their future effects on economic activity in other countries should they implement any new restrictions. One sector that is likely to acutely feel any slowdowns in activity is the energy sector. In China, the largest oil refiner, OPEC, is said to cut run rates by five to 10 percent in August as compared to the prior month. While other companies are reporting unspecified levels of production, one of the largest sources of demand for that refined product comes from travel, which is taking a major hit in the country. International travel is one of the key points of China's new covid restrictions, this is already playing out in flight data. In a recent week in August, China's top 20 airports showed traffic at just 40 percent of peak twenty nineteen levels. The same is true on the roads as congestion was also significantly off. The exact impact on fuel demand can't yet be measured, but some experts are estimating that between late July and early August, demand was down as much as 30 percent from prior periods. The effect of these restrictions on Chinese economic data may be a good measure for what we could expect in other regions should lockdown's move around the globe. But Chinese asset prices may not be. It's hard to tell how big of an effect the slowdown is having on asset prices in China as the markets begin to show signs of weakness from their tech crackdown long before many of the stricter lockdown measures were implemented. No matter how you slice it, though, Chinese shares have taken a major hit. The iShares MSCI China ETF peaked in February and has fallen over twenty five percent since then. Tech names bearing the brunt of the scrutiny from Beijing fared even worse, with Krein shares China Internet ETF down over fifty five percent in the same period. This equity weakness has not made it to the U.S. quite yet. After a brief scare in US tech, likely due to forced liquidations and margin calls as investors Chinese positions took hits, U.S. equity indices have continued to show incredible resilience in the face of economic uncertainty. With the exception of the Russell Two Thousand Index, every major US benchmark has made new all time highs in the last few weeks. These rallies have largely been driven by the highest quality large cap stocks like the Fang M complex. While more speculative names have struggled since peaking out earlier this year, this can largely be seen by the performance of meem, stocks and spaatz. Although there is not a well-defined benchmark yet for Speck's ETFs like S.P.C.A., which aim to track a broad basket of these new issues, is down over 30 percent since February 17th. Interestingly, just one day off of China's tech peak individual meme, stocks like GameStop and AMC have not languished for nearly as long as icepacks or even returned to the levels seen before. Speculative interest sent them soaring higher. But over the last few months, those stocks have come down significantly from their peaks. If there's one thing investors learned in twenty twenty is that the market is not the economy, and especially with policy support, asset prices can remain strong in the face of economic uncertainty and even flat out weakness. So far, this seems to once again be the case. One of the first signs of economic slowdown in the US was weakening consumer sentiment, as measured by the University of Michigan survey. This survey badly last week, with households reporting lower than expected consumer confidence coming in a reading of seventy point two after expectations of eighty one point two. This reading was even lower than the April twenty twenty reading. At the peak of the pandemic, the weakness of the US consumer was confirmed once again this week with another bad miss. U.S. retail sales fell one point one percent month over month, missing expectations of a small decline of just point three percent. This metric is historically finicky, flip flopping from positive to negative quite frequently. But the US consumer is the foremost driver of the US economy, and with resurging fears around covid, investors need to be paying attention for any sort of downward trend here. On the positive side, the month over month change in industrial production came in above expectations at point nine percent growth compared to the expectation of zero point five percent. The year over year numbers were also positive at six point fifty five percent growth, but continued a three month trend of declining increases. The industrial production numbers are holding up well for now, but should be paid close attention to as supply chain issues continue. These supply chain issues can be seen by the current levels of the Baltic Dry Index, which tracks the cost of moving raw materials by sea. The index is seeing ten year highs and reflecting the massive rise in cost to get goods from point A to point B. Should this continue, we may see industrial production slip as producers struggle to get the supplies they need at affordable prices. We mentioned earlier how investors are often finding themselves squaring worsening economic realities with rising asset prices as these forward looking markets can price an optimism around future growth. But some markets have a much harder time looking forward. Commodity markets and more specifically, energy markets are one of the most real time sectors, as daily and weekly fluctuations in supply and demand can have huge effects on commodity prices and their related equities. Last year, we saw oil prices go negative as the world locked down. Now, this was partially driven by a price war between Russia and the Saudis who have since come into alignment. But questions remain on how demand destruction could impact this highly sensitive market as well. With consumers already hurting, rising gas prices have become a political issue in the US. President Biden has asked for and been denied increased production from OPEC plus for an administration already dealing with trouble. The Middle East squabbles with OPEC plus and rising gas prices are one problem they really don't need. That's why this week in the Chatter segment, I spoke with Jim Mitchel, head of Refinitiv America's oil analysts, to discuss how significant this plea from the Biden administration is, how to quantify the potential demand shocks due to Delta and this new reality that demand and not supply may be the key factor driving oil prices.
Max Wiethe [00:08:28] All right, Jim, thank you so much for joining us for the chatter section here on the big conversation. We're going to be talking about oil today. Why don't we just start out with a broad question. Where are we in the oil markets right now with the Biden administration asking for more oil, even as OPEC plus has agreed to start raising production?
Jim Mitchel [00:08:47] Yeah, that's a great question and very topical. The optics look really really bad for the president's administration. I don't necessarily think, though, that the statement made by Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, I don't think it's necessarily incongruous with his plan. As I understood the Biden administration's plan there, they've always been about cheap energy for Americans. Now, the question then becomes what kind of cheap energy? And that's where the difference between the green segment, the Green Movement, which really helped get President Biden elected, and the more traditional oil and gas sector, who has been a little bit on their heels in terms of where the market goes forward. So how does this all play together? I think it's about timing. So the oil industry has always been a long game. There's very little that happens. And there are some things, but very little that happens that immediately impacts the oil industry. Obviously, covid was was one thing that immediately impacted. But in terms of investment, in terms of production, all this stuff is stretched out over years, if not decades. What President Biden was asking for is, I think, more politically related than oil related. Gasoline prices are really high. I saw some six dollars at the pump, Prince in California, which may be a little bit extreme. So I saw more of them around the four fifty dollar a gallon area. I really think this has to do more with the upcoming election cycle, which should start in about three or four months here.
Max Wiethe [00:10:30] So we've lost about, I think, six million barrels since covid from OPEC plus and then about two million barrels from shale. Some of that you would think shale is something that the US controls, something that we can go. Why is he going to OPEC versus maybe trying to work within our own backyard to incentivize some of that production to come back online?
Jim Mitchel [00:10:53] Yeah, yeah. Another great question. The US at its peak produced a little over 13 million barrels a day. Now we're about eleven point two, eleven point three, eleven point four. We kind of sit in that area and that's the question why didn't President Biden address other American companies? Why can't we do it? We're, as I mentioned, probably a million, eight short of where we were. Why can't we get back there? There's some pretty powerful market forces going on. And obviously the president and his administration know this, there's a shortage of crude, literally workers. There's issues with permitting, right? There's issues with capital expenditure from oil companies. Do they want to increase production? There's some of the wells that are in the non core area that are marginal producers, which is to say they have a higher cost of production and don't produce quite as much. Those are the wells mostly that are off bringing those back. It certainly could be at seventy dollars a barrel for WTI. You would have thought those would have come back because most of that break evens around 60 to maybe fifty five ish. But they're not and they're not coming back for some of the market reasons that I just mentioned. Another one that I did mention this that we saw in the earnings releases was there are some massive hedge losses in this industry, by my count, somewhere around 12 billion dollars. So that's a straight extract of cash as these companies have to put a margin relative to that oil, which is future revenue still in the ground.
Max Wiethe [00:12:38] Yeah, and you talked about how it actually is a much longer term sector than most people think, given the big spikes we've seen in the past few months. But I think part of the reason shale isn't coming back on is because of people being burned in this last cycle. And many of the lenders, a lot of this is funded by by debt capital, they require hedging in the market and so we have a backward dated curve right now. And so, yes, we might have spot prices up around 70 dollars a barrel. But the shale producers, they have to hedge out that risk and this backward dated curb, we're much closer to that breakeven price than we are with the seven spot. How much does curved shape affect the market?
Jim Mitchel [00:13:18] The forward curve is definitely something that does come into account. But again, for producers, you know, they're looking at they want to be producing oil for 10 or 20 years, not three months. So does it come into play? Sure it does. Does it affect their hedging? Yes sort of but most of that is determined by their banks or whoever is financing them. And one of the thing that I saw that was pretty interesting, I thought that some of the bigger companies that can hit the capital markets have and they have in a big way, I think somewhere in the 40 billion dollar range, some of the bond covenants that I'm hearing about is that they cannot use this new money directly for drilling. The new money is intended to shore up the balance sheet, which could be a play. Obviously, they don't release that kind of stuff to me, but that could be something that's coming into play here.
Max Wiethe [00:14:20] OK, and I think the final question I want to ask is about Delta variant. And then some of the shock with oil has been from the increased production coming out of OPEC plus. But a little bit of it because we have seen that steady rally sort of bubble a little bit over the last few months. How much of it is because of these concerns around the returns to lock down? You saw Australia, I think, today and not announcing a return to total lockdown when you factor in what the demand, potential demand destruction could be for what looks like would probably be if we did get lockdown's would not be a true global lock down like we saw before, something much more intermittent on a countrywide basis or country by country basis. How do you think about that, that potential for demand destruction and how it could be relative to last time?
Jim Mitchel [00:15:02] Yeah, and I think that the basis of this question is the really, really important thing. In years past, it was all about supply. Now we are much more in a demand driven market. So we see an outsized impact of what we saw with covid a year ago, a year and a half ago. And we're going to see that outsized impact continue because we're in a demand driven market. To answer your question, the big demand centers are really going to drive this. So the covid outbreaks in China is affecting demand and it's maybe not affecting demand as much right now as we talk about it. But the expectation that if the Delta variant goes crazy in China, it's going to affect demand. Now, with that said, China overproduced in the last probably two or three months. They have a lot of inventory and the cracks, the difference between crude in and products out, the cracks got beat up pretty hard in Asia. The US is a little bit different story. So US is the single biggest demand market. And if you bring in the Americas, as the US continues to export gasoline and diesel to Mexico and Brazil and other Latin American countries, as covid impacts these various areas in different ways and circumstances, it affects that demand in a big, big way. And there's also regional variations. California is different from Texas, which is different from Chicago. There is refining in each of these areas. Obviously, Texas has about a third of the country's refining. So as far as Texas goes, so does the excess of gasoline and diesel that Texas produces to go elsewhere. California and the West Coast prior to covid a lot more balanced, which means then when covid hits the West Coast. There's a lot extra gasoline and diesel around, and if China continues to put product into the Atlantic, that creates a big excess as China has curtailed exports and the demand in California, for example, is going crazy. That's why they're getting the gasoline prices that they are. They're short supply.
Max Wiethe [00:17:38] Well, so, you know, I'd like to wrap this up here. We've talked about a lot of things. You really highlighted the importance of this being a demand driven market. When you think about the indicators that everybody focus on the oil market should be watching moving forward, where should we all be looking?
Jim Mitchel [00:17:54] Well, I think it's really a demand supply thing. So coming into 2021, our research at Refinitiv suggested that we were about a million and a half, a million seven barrels a day short. Right. So that means demand over supply. As we were coming into Q3 starting in July, we expected that to come way closer to balanced, to maybe even slightly over a little bit supply. One of the things that I think has changed is OPEC and specifically Saudi Arabia's reluctance to increase oil production. So by our analysis, we look to be a million and a half barrels ish short pretty much through the end of the year unless something changes.
Max Wiethe [00:18:45] OK, well, Jim, thank you so much for coming on the chatter segment today and looking forward to having you back again soon.
Jim Mitchel [00:18:52] Thanks. I appreciate you having me.
Max Wiethe [00:18:58] Once again, we'd like to remind you that if you have any questions about topics covered in this episode or topics you'd like covered in future episodes, please post them in the comments below. Thank you for watching.